Contact
Boston
Providence
August 15, 2016
OPPS 2017 – Implementation of Section 603 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015
By Crystal Bloom and Amanda Beauregard
CMS recently released its proposed rule for the Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) for 2017. Among its major provisions, the proposed rule includes policies to further the implementation of Section 603 of Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015. Section 603 prohibits OPPS payment for applicable items and services furnished on or after 1/1/2017 by certain off-campus provider-based hospital outpatient departments (“Off-Campus HOPD”). As an overview, the proposed rule:
- Establishes the requirements by which an Off-Campus HOPD may qualify as an “excepted location,” exempt from application of the payment changes set forth in Section 603.
- Establishes the requirements by which certain items and services furnished by a given off-campus Off-Campus HOPD may be considered “excepted items and services” and be paid under the OPPS.
- Describes the applicable payment system for items and services furnished by nonexcepted Off-Campus HOPD and for items and services furnished by excepted Off-Campus HOPDs that are not covered services under the OPPS (collectively “nonexcepted items and services”).
Excepted Locations
A. On-Campus versus Off-Campus
Only Off-Campus HOPD are subject to Section 603; on-campus departments are not affected. Campus is defined by regulation as “the physical area immediately adjacent to the provider’s main buildings, other areas and structures that are not strictly contiguous to the main buildings but are located within 250 yards of the main buildings, and any other areas determined on an individual case basis, by the CMS regional office, to be part of the provider’s campus.” CMS is proposing that on-campus outpatient departments and the items and services provided by such departments be exempt from application of Section 603 and continue to be paid under the OPPS.
B. Excepted Locations (“Grandfathered Off-Campus HOPD”)
The following off-campus locations are “excepted” and, thus, are not affected by Section 603’s payment changes, provided they do not violate the relocation, change of ownership, or service expansion provisions detailed below:
- Any Off-Campus HOPD billing Medicare under the OPPS prior to November 2, 2015
- Off-Campus HOPDs located within 250 yards of an inpatient satellite
C. Relocation of Grandfathered Off-Campus HOPDs
CMS is proposing that Grandfathered Off-Campus HOPDs and the items and services that are furnished by such departments would lose the ability to be paid under OPPS if the Grandfathered Off-Campus HOPD relocates from the physical address that was listed on the provider’s CMS-855A as of 11/1/2015. In the case of addresses with multiple units, the unit number is considered part of the address, such that a Grandfathered Off-Campus HOPD could not move into another unit in its building and continue to be paid under OPPS. If a Grandfathered Off-Campus HOPD moves to a new address, the items and services provided at the new location will not be paid under OPPS.
CMS is soliciting comments on whether it should develop a relocation exception for hospitals struck by a natural disaster or experiencing extraordinary circumstances that would Grandfathered Off-Campus HOPDs to relocate in limited situations. In addition, CMS is soliciting comments on whether it should consider relocation exceptions for any other circumstances that are completely beyond the hospital’s control. It is yet to be seen whether CMS will adopt an exception for footprint growth within the same address or an exception based on the “substantially similar” test.
D. Change of Ownership of Grandfathered Off-Campus HOPD
CMS is proposing that excepted status for a Grandfathered Off-Campus HOPD will transfer to new ownership only if ownership of the entire hospital is also transferred and the associated Medicare provider agreement is accepted by the new owner.
Excepted Items and Services
A. Dedicated Emergency Department (EDs)
Section 603 of the Act applies to items and services other than items and services furnished by a dedicated ED. CMS is proposing that all services furnished in a dedicated ED, regardless of whether the ED is located on- or off-campus, and regardless of whether the services are emergent, be exempt from application of the Act and thus continue to be paid under the OPPS.
B. Clinical Family of Services
CMS is proposing that a Grandfathered Off-Campus HOPD be limited to reimbursement under the OPPS for the provision of items and services that it was furnishing as of 11/1/2015. Moreover, CMS is proposing that service types be defined by 19 clinical families of hospital outpatient service types, such that if a Grandfathered Off-Campus HOPD furnished and billed for any specific service within a clinical family of services prior to 11/2/2015, that entire clinical family of services would be excepted and be eligible to receive payment under the OPPS.
C. Service Expansion
While Grandfathered Off-Campus HOPDs will be paid at OPPS rates for only those clinical families of services furnished and billed prior to 11/2/2015, CMS is proposing that the expansion of a Grandfathered Off-Campus HOPD to provide items and services beyond those within the clinical families of services furnished and billed prior 11/2/2015 will not be paid under OPPS. Thus, if a Grandfathered Off-Campus HOPD begins to furnish services from a new clinical family of services after 11/2/2015, these new clinical families of services will not be paid under the OPPS.
Payment System for “Nonexcepted Items and Services”
To comply with Section 603, CMS intends to provide a mechanism for Off-Campus HOPDs to receive payment for “nonexcepted items and services” under an applicable payment system that is not the OPPS; however, CMS believes there is no straightforward way to do that before 1/1/2017. Accordingly, CMS is proposing a one-year temporary solution.
A. CY 2017
CMS proposes to designate the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule as the applicable payment system for the payment of the majority of “nonexcepted items and services” furnished in new Off-Campus HOPDs. Physicians furnishing “nonexcepted items and services” in these departments would be paid based on the professional claim at the “nonfacility rate,” as no separate facility payment would be made to the hospital. Alternatively, CMS proposes that a new Off-Campus HOPD could enroll as the type of freestanding provider/supplier for which it wishes to bill in order to meet the requirements of that payment system (e.g., ASC).
B. CY 2018 and Beyond
CMS is soliciting comments on regulatory and operational changes that could be made to allow an Off-Campus HOPD to bill and be paid for “nonexcepted items and services” under an applicable payment system other than the OPPS, such as the MPFS.
About the Authors
Sign up for email alerts
© 2019 | website: visual dialogue
News
Health Law
-
August 27, 2019
Best Lawyers in America® 2020 Recognizes Barrett & Singal Partners
-
November 06, 2018
| Elizabeth Foley
Sweeping New Opioid Law Extends Anti-Kickback Liability to Private Insurance Market in Three Areas
-
November 05, 2018
Adelita Orefice Earns Certification in Healthcare Compliance
-
October 22, 2018
Super Lawyers® Recognizes Barrett & Singal Attorneys
-
September 18, 2018
| Crystal Bloom, Andrew Levine
DPH releases proposed amendments to Determination of Need regulation
-
August 20, 2018
| Robert Blaisdell
Governor Baker Signs Sweeping Reform on Employee non-Competition Agreements Law
-
August 15, 2018
Best Lawyers in America® recognizes four Barrett & Singal attorneys for their excellence in law.
-
June 13, 2018
| Michelle Peirce, David Chorney
Michelle Peirce and David Chorney Co-Host FBA Health Law Committee Panel
-
October 24, 2017
| Jeffrey Chase-Lubitz
Legal Issues and the Aging Physician
-
October 11, 2017
| Andrew Levine
Department of Public Health Presentation on DoN Regulations
-
August 22, 2017
Best Lawyers, Lawyers Weekly, and Superlawyers Recognize DBS Attorneys
-
July 20, 2017
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court rules that terminating an employee for using medical marijuana may constitute handicap discrimination.
-
February 16, 2017
| Diane Moes
The ACA May Be in Jeopardy, but MACRA Isn’t Likely to Go Away
-
January 16, 2017
| Andrew Levine, Crystal Bloom
DPH Adopts New Determination of Need Regulations
-
November 09, 2016
| Andrew Levine, Crystal Bloom, Adelita Orefice
UPDATE: Preliminary Injunction Temporarily Halts Implementation of Final Rule Prohibiting Pre-Dispute Arbitration Contracts in LTC Facilities
-
October 24, 2016
| Andrew Levine, Crystal Bloom, Adelita Orefice
UPDATE: Nursing Facilities Sue HHS to Block Ban on Pre-Dispute Binding Arbitration Agreements
-
October 17, 2016
| Andrew Levine, Crystal Bloom, Adelita Orefice
HHS Prohibits Long-Term Care Facilities from Using Pre-Dispute Binding Arbitration Agreements
-
August 31, 2016
| Robert Blaisdell,
Massachusetts Enacts Equal Pay Act: What employers can do now to prepare for its implementation
-
August 29, 2016
| Andrew Levine, Crystal Bloom
Massachusetts Department of Public Health Announces Major Determination of Need Regulatory Reform Initiative
-
August 29, 2016
| Elizabeth Foley, Mikaela Taberner
New MA Prescription Monitoring Program Goes Live August 22, 2016
-
August 12, 2016
| Robert Blaisdell
CMS cracks down on “abuse” of nursing home residents via social media
-
July 20, 2016
| Kelly McGee, Adelita Orefice
Rhode Island Prohibits Physician Non-Competes
-
June 28, 2016
Massachusetts Trial Court Dismisses Wrongful Employment Termination Claim Based on Medical Marijuana Use
-
May 17, 2016
| Robert Blaisdell,
Noncompliance with Security Deposit Law Could Be a Defense to Eviction
-
April 19, 2016
| Crystal Bloom
Update Regarding DPH Increased Oversight of Long-Term Care Facilities
-
April 11, 2016
| Crystal Bloom
DPH Strengthens Oversight of Long-Term Care Facilities
-
March 23, 2016
| Andrew Levine, Andrew Ferrer
Governor Baker Signs Legislation Designed To Address Opioid Crisis
-
March 23, 2016
| Kelly McGee
Phase 2 HIPAA Compliance Audits Set To Begin
-
March 22, 2016
| Robert Blaisdell,
Failure to execute HIPAA business associate agreement and conduct risk analysis costs health system $1.55M
-
February 11, 2016
| Kelly McGee
Proposed Rule Modifies 42 CFR Part 2, the Confidentiality of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Patient Records Regulations
-
November 16, 2015
| Andrew Levine, Crystal Bloom, Nicole Sexton
Medicare Hospital Reimbursement Changes
-
October 26, 2015
Diane Moes named one of Mass Lawyers Weekly’s “Top Women of Law”
-
June 12, 2015
OIG Fraud Alert Warns Doctors That They Will Be Personally Accountable for Violations of Federal Anti-Kickback Statute
-
May 15, 2015
| Andrew Levine
Long Term Care Facility Regulatory Update
-
April 23, 2015
| Andrew Levine
Department of Public Health - new process for the addition of licensed mobile or portable health care units
-
April 21, 2015
| Paul Barrett, Jeffrey Chase-Lubitz
OIG Releases Compliance And Oversight Guide for Healthcare Boards
-
April 20, 2015
| Andrew Levine,
Massachusetts Department of Public Health Revamps Application Process for Registered Medical Marijuana Dispensaries
-
April 16, 2015
| Crystal Bloom, Andrew Levine
Proposed Legislation Will Increase Legal Authority of Health Policy Commission and Attorney General
-
March 15, 2015
| Andrew Levine
Health Policy Commission Releases Proposed Regulation Concerning Nurse-to-Patient Ratios | Public hearings scheduled for late March and early April
-
March 06, 2015
| Robert Blaisdell
Court Holds Officers and Directors of Non-Profit Healthcare Facility Personally Liable to Creditors for Breach of Fiduciary Duty
-
September 17, 2014
| Andrew Levine, Robert Blaisdell, Kathleen Harrell
Legal Issues Associated with MA Registered Marijuana Dispensaries: An article by Andrew Levine, Robert Blaisdell, and Kathleen Harrell
-
July 14, 2014
| Andrew Levine
Important Compounding Pharmacy Law Empowers Board of Registration in Pharmacy
-
June 20, 2014
| Crystal Bloom, Andrew Levine
Public Health Council Approves Amendments to Determination of Need Regulations
-
June 03, 2014
| Diane Moes
U.S. District Court Ruling Vacating HRSA’s 340B Program Orphan Drug Exclusion Rule Casts Uncertainty on Forthcoming "Mega-Rule"
-
May 28, 2014
| Andrew Levine
New Guidelines for Dementia Special Care Unit Regulations
-
January 10, 2014
| Andrew Levine
MassHealth Changes regulations to comply with Affordable Care Act
Litigation
-
August 27, 2019
Best Lawyers in America® 2020 Recognizes Barrett & Singal Partners
-
December 08, 2018
CNN interviews Bruce Singal about the Mueller Investigation
-
October 22, 2018
Super Lawyers® Recognizes Barrett & Singal Attorneys
-
August 23, 2018
Bruce Singal explains the legal implications of Michael Cohen's plea and Paul Manafort's conviction on "Greater Boston"
-
August 15, 2018
Best Lawyers in America® recognizes four Barrett & Singal attorneys for their excellence in law.
-
August 09, 2018
Jim Braude Interviews Litigation Co-Chair Bruce Singal
-
June 13, 2018
| Michelle Peirce, David Chorney
Michelle Peirce and David Chorney Co-Host FBA Health Law Committee Panel
-
May 30, 2018
Bruce Singal discussed the Mueller Investigation on "Greater Boston"
-
May 10, 2018
Mass Lawyers Weekly Recognizes Elizabeth McEvoy
-
April 05, 2018
| Bruce Singal
In Russia probe, the difference between ‘target’ and ‘subject’ matters a great deal
-
February 22, 2018
Landmark Supreme Court Decision Substantially Narrows the Applicability of the Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Provision
-
February 01, 2018
Michelle Peirce and Bruce Singal awarded Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly’s Lawyer of the Year award.
-
August 22, 2017
Best Lawyers, Lawyers Weekly, and Superlawyers Recognize DBS Attorneys
-
July 20, 2017
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court rules that terminating an employee for using medical marijuana may constitute handicap discrimination.
-
August 31, 2016
| Robert Blaisdell,
Massachusetts Enacts Equal Pay Act: What employers can do now to prepare for its implementation
-
August 12, 2016
| Robert Blaisdell
CMS cracks down on “abuse” of nursing home residents via social media
-
June 28, 2016
3 Things Every Massachusetts Podiatrist Should Know About the Proposed Amendments to Podiatry Regulations
-
June 01, 2016
How Recent Changes to the Fair Labor Standards Act’s “White Collar” Exemptions May Affect Your Small Business
-
March 25, 2015
Avoiding Securities Fraud Prosecution: Using the SEC’s 2015 examination priorities as a compliance roadmap when dealing with retail investors.
-
December 29, 2014
| Bruce Singal
Was the Ferguson grand jury rigged?
-
March 26, 2014
Employer Avoids Discrimination Trial Thanks to Robust Investigation and Documentation Policies
-
February 13, 2014
| Michelle Peirce
Shielding Companies Against Whistleblower Suits
-
March 01, 2010
Trials Facing Women Litigators and Tips For Success: Michelle Peirce
-
“Official Immunity” for Private Research Institutions: How a recent federal court decision impacts civil tort lawsuits arising out of research misconduct inquiries / investigations.
-
Research Misconduct Penalties and How to Avoid Them
Corporate
-
August 20, 2018
| Robert Blaisdell
Governor Baker Signs Sweeping Reform on Employee non-Competition Agreements Law
-
March 16, 2018
Massachusetts Equal Pay Act: 5 Things Every Employer Should Do Before It Takes Effect On July 1, 2018
-
August 22, 2017
Best Lawyers, Lawyers Weekly, and Superlawyers Recognize DBS Attorneys
-
June 28, 2016
Massachusetts Trial Court Dismisses Wrongful Employment Termination Claim Based on Medical Marijuana Use
-
June 28, 2016
3 Things Every Massachusetts Podiatrist Should Know About the Proposed Amendments to Podiatry Regulations
Research Misconduct
-
April 22, 2019
| Elizabeth McEvoy
Elizabeth McEvoy Leads Panel at Three I’s Research Integrity Conference
-
February 01, 2018
Michelle Peirce and Bruce Singal awarded Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly’s Lawyer of the Year award.
-
March 23, 2016
| Andrew Levine, Andrew Ferrer
Governor Baker Signs Legislation Designed To Address Opioid Crisis
-
What is Research Misconduct and Why Should I Care?
-
“Official Immunity” for Private Research Institutions: How a recent federal court decision impacts civil tort lawsuits arising out of research misconduct inquiries / investigations.
-
Research Misconduct Penalties and How to Avoid Them
This website presents general information about Barrett & Singal and is not intended as legal advice nor should you consider it as such. You should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.
Please note that contacting Barrett & Singal by email, telephone or facsimile will not establish an attorney-client relationship, obligate us to act as your attorney or impose an obligation on either the law firm or the receiving lawyer to keep the transmitted information confidential. Completion of Barrett & Singal’s new client intake protocol, including without limitation the firm’s conflicts checking process and an engagement letter, is necessary to establish an attorney-client relationship. Absent a current attorney-client relationship with Barrett & Singal, any information or documents communicated or transmitted by you to Barrett & Singal will not be treated as confidential, secret or protected in any way. If you are not a current client of Barrett & Singal, please do not send any confidential information to us through this web site or otherwise concerning any potential or actual legal matter you have. Before providing any confidential information to us, you must obtain permission to do so from one of the firm’s lawyers. By clicking "Accept," you acknowledge that we have no obligation to maintain the confidentiality of any information you submit to us unless we already represent you or unless we have agreed to receive limited confidential material/information from you as a prospective client.
If you would like to discuss becoming a client, please contact one of our attorneys to arrange for a meeting or telephone conference. If you wish to disclose confidential information to a lawyer in the firm before an attorney-client relationship is established, the protections that the law firm will provide to such information from a prospective client should be discussed with the firm attorney before such information is submitted. Thank you for your interest in Barrett & Singal.